One thing you’ll notice reading the book, though, is the
lack of quote marks. Instead, Huston uses dashes at the beginning of a line to
indicate someone’s speaking. There are no dialogue tags either.
It was something I thought would bother me when I first
started reading, but a page or two into it I was fine without the quotes. I did
get me wondering, though, what others thought about this kind of rule bending.
How much are you
willing to put up with something like creative punctuation in a novel? Does it
bother you when an author breaks the rules?
As long as it's clear the author knows the rules, I don't have an issue with them breaking the rules. I might not like the style the author chooses, but I wouldn't have a major issue with the author experimenting.
ReplyDelete-Neal
This is not common, but has been done before; William Gay did it in one of his later novels. It assists with the immediacy of the action, and i think it works on a less conscious level than 1st-person present tense.
ReplyDeleteI'm with you, Neal. I also like for the writer to be consistent with his or her rule breaking. Do it all the way through a piece and it's easy to adapt too.
ReplyDeleteOh, and don't go breaking five or six rules. Stick to one. Then make sure everything else in your book/story is near perfect.
This may very well be a good way to go in the twitter generation.
ReplyDeleteWhich part, Court? The dropping of punctuation or the shorter chapters? Or is it both?
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed this post thanks for sharing.
ReplyDelete